TPO 46 - Question 6
Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
---|---|---|---|
2018-10-05 | Sabarnakha | 60.00 | Check this speaking |
2017-01-13 | -vv- | Check this speaking | |
2018-08-22 | Aftab1 | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
2018-07-17 | Mennatallah | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
2016-08-05 | nahid89 | Check this speaking |
- if you had the choice would you have a son or a daughter 85
- TPO 31 - Question 4 60
- 381 is there anywhere you would particularly like to visit? 80
- TPO 07 - Question 1If friends from another country were going to spend time in your country, what city or place would you suggest they visit? Using details and examples, explain why. 80
- 1246 Describe an interesting event in history you knowYou should sayWho the event wasWhen and where it occurredWho was leading the eventHow you know about itAnd explain why you think it was interesting 60
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.