TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-17 | Mennatallah | 63.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-08-05 | nahid89 | Check this speaking | |
| 2016-11-06 | EugeneDubinchuk | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-08-08 | dshah6611 | 60.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-11-30 | mgrajapt | 80.00 | Check this speaking |
- 2460 correct what are your hobbies and interests? 80
- 1744 in what ways are people's eating habits changing these days? 70
- 2910 describe a funny situation you went throughyou should saywhat happenedwhere you werehow it endedand explain why good sense of humor was important at the time. 70
- 1835 Describe a show or performance that you enjoyed watchingYou should sayWhat kind of performance it wasWhen and where you saw itWho you saw it withWho the performers wereAnd explain why you attended this performance 70
- How do you usually spend your weekends? 80
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
Hello.
I just try to understand
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.