When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, human beings are pushing back the frontiers of knowledge and technology by leaps and bounds, thereby revolutionizing humans’ lifestyles. Thus, some argue that the old strategies had better get omitted and give way to new methods. I am personally inclined with this view, but new procedures must always improve the quality of our lives.
Today, many new technologies and advancements have added colors to humans’ lives. It is a natural instinct of people to strive for promotion. In fact, the efficiency of humans’ lives has boosted considerably. For instance, the advent of airplanes has paved the way for humans to travel country to country in a couple of days which was totally impossible in the past. However, previously, people used to ride horses or camels to take a long journey and that was much more time-consuming. Another example which casts light on this evolution is that in the past, people used to knit clothes out of wool with a needle and nobody had access to swing machines. Nevertheless, these days, new technologies and facilities have expedited this process to a great extent, making more profit in textile industry. Therefore, that is thoroughly acceptable to leave off the old methods.
Although new methods are so valuable, we need to be alert about the quality of our lives and the results of new methods should get compared with those of their obsolete counterparts perpetually. To elaborate on it, sometimes humans just think about running a profitable business with the help of new technologies and apparatus, no matter what the outcome is. To exemplify, agriculture industry is a field which has lost its quality under the influence of advancements. In fact, new methods of irrigation, the usages of pesticides and also genetic engineering are some new strategies which have had detrimental impacts on the crops. Although the businessmen can make more profits, the public health would be threatened definitely. So, I believe that people should inspect their standard of living meticulously, even though new methods are so profitable.
In conclusion, it seems to me that in the modern era, we can put aside obsolete procedures in our lives only if we evaluate the quality of our life by comparing the results of new methods with those of the old ones.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 60
- The diagram below shows how a hot water system in a house works. The table gives information about the efficiency levels. 80
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 57
- Individuals can do nothing to change society. Any new developments can only be brought about by governments and large institutions. How far do you agree or disagree? 60
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...new methods with those of the old ones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10846560847 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96546214517 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563492063492 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3528802068 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.277777778 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0815558266434 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024446406046 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027937534957 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498240618467 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143250864123 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.