It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree of disagree?
It is argued that government funding should be used for launching healthy lifestyle campaigns rather than treating patients. In my opinion, both should be equally funded by the government.
It is true that prevention is better than cure. If the government focuses on promoting the benefits of a healthy lifestyle, public awareness will be increased heighten and people will break their bad habits and replace them with positive routines. This can be seen in the case of “Eat Clean”, which has been a new trend in recent years. A large number of people realized that ready-made food and food which is high in sugar adversely affect their body and health; therefore, they started consuming organic, sugar-free and home-made food. As a result, living healthy has strengthened public health and boosted community immunity, which reduced the number of ill cases. Therefore, the government could cut down on costs for sick care.
On the other hand, the government should take notice of treatment costs because it has influence over the economic growth and population. Therefore, developing healthcare services and treating patients are necessary. Boosting funding for researching vaccines to prevent being infected by coronavirus plays a good example here. Since 2019, it has become a global pandemic, with over 250 million people infected and over 5 million deaths. In order to reduce the number of positive and death cases, the authorities worldwide have allocated a considerable amount of money for constructing field hospitals and discovering new cures. This is no less important and imperative than promoting a healthy lifestyle.
In conclusion, the government should invest in both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating people who are already ill.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
- TASK 2 The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Is this a positive or negative development 56
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- A flow chart shows the process of processing wool into cloth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people think that the news media has become much more influential in people s lives today and it is a negative development Do you agree or disagree 82
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in 1998 and 2005 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is argued that government funding should be used for la...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...h has been a new trend in recent years. A large number of people realized that ready-made food an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40579710145 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79570251117 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7074417675 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188108198273 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062321256133 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724492521899 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134499019733 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823544671102 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.