The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it can be observed that fish consumption trend has decreased somehow during observation period. However, beef and lamb meet consumption rate is decreasing in a high ratio. On the other hand chicken meet uses per person per week have rapidly growing.
Horizontal axis presents per person consumption of meats and fish in a week and vertical axis shows the observation period from 1979 to 2004. The given data shows that there is not significant change in fish consumption. In 1979 fish consumption was about 60 grams where as about 45 grams in 2004. Similarly, lamb meat consumption trend line has declining in a fast rate. In 1979 it was about 150 grams but in 2004 it decreased to about 60 grams only. Likewise, consumption of beef meat also decline in consumption after 1084. In between 1079 to 1984 there was fluctuation. The interesting fact is that consumption of chicken meat has been rapidly increasing while other meats and fish are in declining trend. In 1979 it was lower than beef i.e. about 95 grams and almost 210 grams respectively. But in 2004 rate of chicken consumption raised to 250 grams.
- The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002. 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- he chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004. 73
- The chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...979 fish consumption was about 60 grams where as about 45 grams in 2004. Similarly, lamb...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86387434555 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72787430246 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9254735254 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4615384615 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258907242663 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962097173197 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482384801955 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188282415781 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518635800068 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.