Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic claims that a beginner is more likely to make important contributions in any field as compared to experts. Undeniably, beginners have more energy and vigor than seasoned people, so it may seem in some areas of inquiry, that beginner is making more crucial contributions as compared to experts. Nevertheless, the expertise of experts should not be ignored, the skills and ideas gained by experts through years of involvement in certain sector certaily weighs more than few noticeable contributions of beginners. Thus, i would like to disagree with the statement and would like to argue that experts are, in fact, more likely to contribute to most of the fields as compared to beginners.
First of all, it is important to realize that being expert in certain field takes a lot of time and dedication. One is only considered expert after S/he contributes a large chunk of their lifetime in understanding and developing a certain field. They are more seasoned to the practical scenarios that many beginner learners are yet to adapt with.
For instance, a person becomes a professor when s/he has dedicated generally a decade or more in that field, during this time they gain invaluable knowledge, deal with all types of students, experiment with their teaching methodologies to reach the position. Such experience and skill cannot be expected from a beginner in same field, they will have to go through similar situations and deal with similar problems and only can achive the position.
Another point to consider is that, mostly beginners have no clue about the practical scenario of their fields. Surely, they might have all the theoritical knowledges and skills to solve things in theory but things are not alike in actual field. They also do not know the scope of their field and do not know other experts in field who may be helpful if they bump into some problems, so it is possible that they just wander aimlessly for the help but such scenario is less likely to occur with experts as they have been dealing with many similar situations before. For instance, a new doctor may have no idea to differentiate between a mild abdomen pain and appenx pain, they may struggle to decipher the problem by explanation of symptoms by patients and may solve for solutions in some books and spend lots of time whereas an adept doctor would instantly diagnose the problem with patients within minutes.
Finally, it doesnt mean that beginners can not make contributions in any fields merely because they are beginners, there maybe few cases where a beginner might have outperformed experts too, but few exceptional cases shouldnt be made the basis for such genarelisations and claims.
In conclusion, experts are more skilled and likely to make more contributions than beginners. Although, new learners can excel in their areas and make noteworthy contributions without much experience, such instances are rare. In fact, experience and immersion in field for few years sharpens their skill and are more likely to make contributions because their theoritical knowledge and awareness to real worls problems motivates to bring necessary solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 53 | view |
- "The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large. "Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your o 66
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 66
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.Discuss the extent to 75
- "In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County recently lowered its speed limit from 55 miles per hour to 45 on all major county roads. But the 55 mph limit should be restored, because this safety effort has failed. Most drivers are exceeding the 69
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 528, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...eable contributions of beginners. Thus, i would like to disagree with the stateme...
^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and skills to solve things in theory but things are not alike in actual field. Th...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...h patients within minutes. Finally, it doesnt mean that beginners can not make contri...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... experts too, but few exceptional cases shouldnt be made the basis for such genarelisati...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2631.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08897485493 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7799688399 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481624758221 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5943794409 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.764705882 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4117647059 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0540252182998 0.243740707755 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0210884427044 0.0831039109588 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0163885281602 0.0758088955206 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0327497141025 0.150359130593 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146185910631 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.