The table shows the proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between 2000 and 2009.

Essay topics:

The table shows the proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between 2000 and 2009.

The tabular chart illustrates the percentage of teenagers who attended the various schools such as specialist schools and grammar schools from 2000 to 2009.
Having a look on the voluntary controlled schools, the attendance of the children was just above a half percent in 2000 however in the middle of the year it followed declining trend about 38% whereas it was a 18% lesser than the former year in 2009.Moreover, 24% children attended the classes in grammar school but, in the further years like in 2005 , 2009 it inclined with 19% and 12% respectively.
By having a glance on, the pupils of the community schools in initially year attended only 12% classes and in 2005 it was upsurging with 20%.Surprisingly the percentage of Pupils was near about doubled in previous year as compare to the 2005.In case of the total proportions of the specialist schools similar to the community schools in 2000.In the following years it dropped to with 1% with the comparison of 2000.
Overall, the percentage of the pupils in voluntary controlled schools were more popular but it allocated least trend in specialist schools.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-06 Đa Thiện 61 view
2019-10-12 Lia Bui 73 view
2019-08-12 Jotdeep 78 view
2019-07-28 harshiniharshini 78 view
2019-07-05 anmol khipal 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eclining trend about 38% whereas it was a 18% lesser than the former year in 2009...
^
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...18% lesser than the former year in 2009.Moreover, 24% children attended the classes in g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l but, in the further years like in 2005 , 2009 it inclined with 19% and 12% respe...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Surprisingly
...s and in 2005 it was upsurging with 20%.Surprisingly the percentage of Pupils was near about...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...in previous year as compare to the 2005.In case of the total proportions of the sp...
^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...imilar to the community schools in 2000.In the following years it dropped to with ...
^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'allocated the least'.
Suggestion: allocated the least
...rolled schools were more popular but it allocated least trend in specialist schools.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, moreover, so, whereas, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01075268817 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86465352397 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521505376344 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 22.4926829268 205% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.012259037 43.030603864 302% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 233.0 112.824112599 207% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 46.5 22.9334400587 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241498082736 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156419846503 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554378254527 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156419846503 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554378254527 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.4 13.2329268293 192% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.71 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.3012195122 183% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.67 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.4 10.9970731707 186% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.