More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.
Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
Do you agree or disagree?
Aforementioned topic of “Human resource migration” has its own significance and importance around the world. Where non developed countries are found raising their voices on this issue, developed countries seems quite ok with the scenario as most of these resources are moving in their states for jobs or permanent residence.
This is human nature that a man always goes for the best as it has been kept in his restless nature by GOD. You will find that from the beginning, human being is in a race to achieve the highest in their lives. There are two groups with their way of thinking and both have rationale to prove their stance.
One group is against the idea of movement of skilled workers to developed countries as they are of the view that poor or non-developed countries have more need of these people to stand on its own. They are supporting the view of studying and then working in own countries for betterment of people as well as state. For example, if a medical student comes back after completing his degree and starts practicing in his own country, the country men will be benefited from his expertise. In the same way if an engineering or computer expert uses his expertise in betterment of his country-men, it will help country prosper and state will start moving in the right direction. Whereas, movement of such resources will damage overall economic and social situation of the country which is already in a declining trend.
On contrary, there is a group who think this is a natural process of movement of human resources against normal demand and supply rule. This view is also not wrong but impact of such movements often effects the growth of the country. For instance, if a country is in a process of accepting doctors from all over the world, it might not be possible for its own citizens to get same level of jobs at the time they will complete their study program.
To conclude this, I would like to put my thinking in words by saying that it is the duty of governments to make such rules and processes where if a learned person is ready to serve the nation by staying in his own country, he must be given all the perks he might get by moving to another state. This will help in keeping and utilizing the human resources in a more efficient way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | Yemmy | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | poojary.swetha92@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | MJ Yand | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | kgstestbig | 76 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | kgstestbig | 84 | view |
- Nowadays people are working too hard What is the reason for that What should employers do in order to prevent employees from this 64
- Some people think that public libraries are not necessary today Buy some feel that they r still providing some useful services Discuss both the issues and give your opinion 59
- write about the following topic:People play sports at a young age but drop it in adult age. Why is this the case? What is the solution to this problem?Write at least 250 words 73
- Inventors are not as important to society as doctors.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- People buy things which they don t need Why this is happening Is it a positive or negative development for the Individual and for society 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, whereas, for example, for instance, as well as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63300492611 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.569376387 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4113422785 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0666666667 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171453146483 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595713485039 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498093406959 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858507708712 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649609033773 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.