Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the influence of building on an individual’s life and work. Some people think that the design of a building will bear negative effect on a person’s mind and lifestyle, while others maintain that a well structured building will pose a positive impact on people. In this essay, I shall elaborate the positive impacts and influence of well structured building on mental health and working environment of people.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the architecture of buildings. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that people working in a well desgined building feel proud and are eager to work with more zeal and zest. Not only buidlings effect the working pace, but also it has a direct impact on the phsycological need which includes an improved working environment followed by safety measures incorporated in the design of building. Thus, needless to say, that builidings have a far more positive impact on working as well as physcological needs.
To embark this, another pivotal facet of buildings that proponents are not congnizant with is the amount and exposure of sunlight to people working or living in a well designed building. As an example, in this day and age, 40 percent of people are Vitamin D deficient. As a matter of fact, the positive impact of building on improving a person’s health cannot be overruled.
To recapitulate, the fulfillment of phsycological needs and health benefits rendered by the design of the building outrun the negative impacts of building on a person’s life and work.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 73
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons? 80
- It is a more effective way to learn to work as a team than to work on one’s own. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages? 80
- Individual citizens have nothing to do for complex environmental problems. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, well, while, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14552238806 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0546440729 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511194029851 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2089329442 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509339738766 0.242375264174 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182942920373 0.0925447433944 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109699880321 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323264880399 0.151781067708 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781341211207 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.