Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations?
Students accommodation has been varied based on the university placement. Some students often staying with the families, while others insisted to live with hostel or far away from home. However, there are some pros and cons of both living atmosphere related to character, economize on accommodation, co operation and so on.
Initially, it is often considered that, students live with their parents have family support of all the matters and that would generate their behaviour. In brief, parental support of studies, socio economic situations and security would be the most predominant benefit of staying home. Such as, immediate psychological support of all kinds of crisis and physical are and affection also emerged in students who is in home for university studies. Nevertheless, the main adverse effect of this would be excessive dependency to the family members may lead to fear and poor self esteem. For instance, student survey report from Manchester university that, critical thinking and interacting capability was high in members from hostel.
On the other hand, there are some positive and negative outcome for people who live away from home such as, enhance campaign studies, peer influence and some times misusing freedom. The most important achievement of university accommodation that, students could share ideas and tips for difficult subjects, joining project works and burgeoning sharing mentality. For example, every students would have nostalgic memories with the room mates like secrets, sharing stories and things, maintaining long term friendships and so on. Nonetheless, such students might get chance to involve with other sort of bad habits and attitudes by the peer pressure too. For instance, last week report from the Canadian police that, drug addiction and alcoholism is surged among students who stay away from the parents.
To sum up, university students have had many gains and drawback in accommodation for university studies in terms of individual characteristics and togetherness with co students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | dothai | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | nagakhoa | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | faisal420 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Vahideh_abd | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | kieuoanh.dau | 67 | view |
- Some people think that there should be a complete ban on all forms of advertising To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- Some people believe that the Olympics Games do not have a role in the 21st Century Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience 96
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 15 78
- The charts below reveal the differences in reasons that motivated students to choose a college or university in the UK in 2008 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 20
- Society would benefit from a complete ban on all forms of advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'outcomes'?
Suggestion: outcomes
...d, there are some positive and negative outcome for people who live away from home such...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...too. For instance, last week report from the Canadian police that, drug addiction...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, while, for example, for instance, in brief, sort of, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5127388535 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82521414461 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59872611465 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3206854523 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.642857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331390191756 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111640908034 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787863875839 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210975331561 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618354679053 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.