Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Economic development is considered the optimal solution for calling a halt to worldwide poverty and hunger while it is believed that the growth of economy is negatively affecting the natural habitat. In this essay, this controversial issue will be clearly discussed.
Obviously, the suffering from a setback of life-threatening food shortage and severe malnutrition is originally rooted in long-term abject poverty. Accordingly, a strong finance is regarded as the survival measures to tackle these global probems because developing the economy can help the government to support needy citizens. By doing so, economic industrialization can create enormous amount of job opportunities for the unemployed and the poor. Employees can feed and clothe their family and this can improve purchase power and taxes. As a result, government can allocate the budget to build social housing or dosshouses as well as provide basic needs for people in need so as to alleviate the grinding lower class people and food shortage.
On the flip side, despite aforementioned benefits of financial affairs, the remarkable increase in manufactories and industrial zones has unavoidably resulted in environmental issues. Take the scandal of water pollution caused by the monosodium glutamate producer VEDAN Vietnam on Thi Vai river as an example. According to local residents, the river used to be full of fish and extremely green until the appearance of VEDAN factories built along the bank. It discharged untreated and toxic waste into the Thi Vai river which contaminated the stretch of waterway in southern Dong Nai province and made the water no longer drinkable. Severely, the rising level of pollution in waterways also caused respiratory diseases and intestinal sicknesses among local people living there.
In conclusion, although economic growth is one of the effective solutions to alleviate the poverty and hunger globally, the economic-related eco-problems should be controlled by successful efforts of the government such as blocking and shutting down the factories that are doing harm to the green environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | LucyLiu | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | phanduydat | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Chang Xu | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | cathylearnsrock | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | michidmaa | 89 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- For school children, their teacher have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... provide basic needs for people in need so as to alleviate the grinding lower class peop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'class'' or 'class's'?
Suggestion: class'; class's
...d so as to alleviate the grinding lower class people and food shortage. On the fli...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mentioned benefits of financial affairs, the remarkable increase in manufactories...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56832298137 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12294066246 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633540372671 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.347256721 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.923076923 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11011508932 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322245819866 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546915501351 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802260469238 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062398821285 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.