Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes. should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be build in countryside?
Undoubtedly, rising population become a major issue in many countries and they have need new homes for living. But, today the topic asserts that should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or countryside? I am strong advocate of this approach and now, I am going to examine some possible points with the following paragraph.
First of all, if we see in metro cities in different countries, they are already highly populated. Constructing additional buildings will not only the dense the city area but also effects many other aspects of human life. Moreover, there are lack of resources to survive in the city like as; land, water and other basic useful things, which is major issue to increase the cost of living in suburbs. For instance, Mumbai is the highly congested city of India where the cost of land and other substances touched the sky. Apart from that, more developments in left vacant places can reduce the open premises that can cause traffic congestion on roads and streets at a cost of aesthetic beauty of locations. At last, the environment of the cities is also getting polluted due to the increase in population and their activities.More the houses will turn the more pollution in cities.
On the other hand, expansion towards the countryside can enforce government to develop more facilities like transportation, water supplies, entertainment and so on. Hence, the living standards of villagers can also be improved through the developments. Moreover, the environment of the countryside is clean as well as quiet, which is beneficial for the personal and social health. Finally, spreading towards the undeveloped area can have economic prosperity for the country. Business and residentials can hire more cheap resources like land, labor, etc. in a rural area, which in return will create more jobs for villagers apart from traditional occupations for the personal and economic growth of villages.
To conclude, it is rightly said anything in excessive is dangerous. So rather overcrowding the cities, moving towards the countryside will be the best option for overall development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-01 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-01 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-27 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-27 | ojehparvaz | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | dhillonsukh | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 67
- Some people say that computer games are bad for childern by all means their believe that these games are contributing to childern development.Now discuss other views and opinion. 56
- Some people think that the government should ensure the healthy lifestyle of people, but others argue that it should be decided by individuals.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Some People think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: More
...ease in population and their activities.More the houses will turn the more pollution...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, moreover, so, well, apart from, for instance, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22873900293 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87813441161 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58651026393 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5406835996 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.882352941 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246407724616 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738247994104 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111969597969 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151830233433 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125821310235 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.