Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes. Should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be built in the countryside?
Overpopulation is a growing problem in many countries. The question is that to provide enough accommodations for the growing population, whether new buildings should be constructed in the existing cities or not. I believe that new homes should be built in new towns.
I can explain why it would be better for officials to build new buildings in the countryside. If governments construct new houses in the new towns, they will be able to provide more job opportunities for people in different age groups. This is because more companies and industries will be built to develop the new areas. This situation can easily solve the problem related to the unemployment and oversupply of labour. Moreover, the development of new towns and giving a job to people can help the economy of the cities, as there will be more working adults who can pay a tax which is used for the improvement of public services.
In addition to this, the construction of new apartments in the existing cities can have some negative consequences for both people and the environment. Nowadays, the introduction of advanced technologies in transportation and way of living has led to the dispersal of families, and many individuals are encouraged to live in big cities to progress in their lives. This condition has caused many cities to become too busy. As a result, if governments decide to build more homes in the cities, they need to destroy more green spaces or cut trees and plants to provide the necessary lands for construction. Additionally, overcrowding in big urban areas can intensify the problem related to traffic congestion which can lead to increased air pollution and endanger the health of individuals. We should also consider that officials in intensely populated cities may find it difficult to provide enough facilities for all people, such as medical services. So, after a while living in such areas becomes worse and more unpleasant.
In conclusion, in my view, it is more rational that new buildings to be built in the new towns. In this way, people not only can have a better quality of life but also can keep themselves healthy from pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9721448468 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97008567159 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512534818942 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0882934201 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358243844977 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12682326945 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12224813904 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248134996396 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113901140963 0.056905535591 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.