Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There are some people believe that a high school should organize some unpaid community service for student. From my perspective, this is a win-win situation so I completely agree with this idea.
To begin from the educational view, the society service is utilized to design a true practice lesson for student who do not have a chance to touch the community life. For instance, plenty of vietnamese schools often organize the annual summer voluntary called “green summer”. In this program students could see exactly the hard life on civilians in poor areas, where has not perfect conditions to live, much like education. Additionally, schools teach their students about the true life to raise awareness and mercy inside each student to help society. Beside, each individual also realize oneself still lucky than the other’s.
On the other hand, these unpaid community services are the way to save outcome for limit expense of government. Theoretically, improving the life’s quality of civilians is the significant role of government but, what’s more, this responsibility each government has a number of work to do for entire picture of a country. In particular, the active action from school programs with social activities are the extra resource for welfare. Furthermore, due to the high schools frequently design activity in their own area first, so this is the best ways to touch whole situations easily.
In conclusion, unpaid voluntary community service is became to obligating part of high school programs are the best idea ever not only for training moral attitudes of student but also developing society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Jass Rai | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Harf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
- today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 89
- fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have leads on to the idea that thay are also responsible for briging the children up. 73
- fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have leads on to the idea that thay are also responsible for briging the children up. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
..., unpaid voluntary community service is became to obligating part of high school progr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33976833977 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86726267917 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617760617761 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3578556289 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24884832122 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968363901311 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103385075566 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170931398153 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575929951119 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.