The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.
The bar chart illustrates statistical data regarding to the rate of tourists from Japan travels internationally from 1985 to 1995 while the line graph shows the proportion of Australian toward japan's tourist market. It is apparent from the information supplied that there was an upwards trend over a decade of Japanese tourists going to foreign countries whereas the percentage of Australian visiting travelers also soared.
Increasing from about 5 million in 1985, the number of international trip by Japanese experienced doubling higher in 1990 than previous around 11 million, and then increased to the highest nearly 16 million in 1995, except in 1991 when a slight decrease reached almost 11 million. Furthermore, there was no percent of Japanese tourists coming to Australia until 1985, only 2% out of 5 million Japanese travelers went to Australia. Its amount rocketed beyond 6% in 1930 before a minimal decline in 1989. Ending the duration by a steady drop was 6% exactly which was the number of people who came to Australia in 1994.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. Agree or disagree? 11
- Some people think that professional athletes make good role models for young people, while others believe they don’t.Discuss both view and give own opinion. 78
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in rented and owned accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tralian visiting travelers also soared. Increasing from about 5 million in 1985,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, regarding, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14705882353 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82051922875 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682352941176 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4592206502 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.833333333 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327800528427 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142590825966 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111682861339 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245260876188 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260238196713 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.