Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree
The idea that whether or not people's success is attributed to luck remains a source of controversy. Although there are reasons to justify, I definitely disagree with that opinion.
On the one hand, luck is just a small factor impacting on someone's success. Firstly, people can not solely rely on luck to be successful without requiring any efforts. If a student who only depends on his luck without any studying, chances are he will fail for his exam. Because it is so true that he can not know the answers for all questions or receive friend's help all the time . Secondly, no one can be lucky forever. For example, thanks to winning lottery, a person can become a billionaire during a night. However, it is so clear that he can not win lottery all the rest of his life.
On the other hand, I believe that those who are industrious and patient will achieve their goals. Success always comes to hard working people. For instance, Thomas Edison, despite of more than ten thousand fail experiments, was always still patient with his job. As a result, he invented the light bulb which is a significant invention for both industry and daily life. Another example is Nick Vujicic, although he is a disability without limbs in Australia, he became a well-known motivative speaker. Furthermore, he fulfills conditions to get a bachelor degree in both accountancy and financial planning, and now he is traveling around the world to inspire to youth generation.
In conclusion, for these reasons mentioned above, I believe that success is not the result of luck but hard work and determined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khaihoang | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | nhoxkey200 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | nhoxkey200 | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | coolR | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | bennguyen95 | 84 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not the local people. Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 61
- as well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The idea that whether or not peoples success is attributed to luck r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'someones'' or 'someone's'?
Suggestion: someones'; someone's
...uck is just a small factor impacting on someones success. Firstly, people can not solely...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ons or receive friends help all the time . Secondly, no one can be lucky forever. ...
^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: TO_TOO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...hieve their goals. Success always comes to hard working people. For instance, Thom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87453874539 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71885626508 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608856088561 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4975359643 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864324275416 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304632397872 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362291789408 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596114208257 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329829239288 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.