In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend a large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is considered by many that, relatively a huge amount should be spent in order to build high speed rails in between cities. However, it is argued by some that, this money should use to enhance the existing public transportation facilities. This essay intends to examine both the perspectives. In my opinion, i strongly believe that, it is a great idea to invest on high speed rail projects.
To begin with, there are many reason to support the view since spending a good some of money to build high-speed rails bring many changes in the country. First and foremost thing is that, it will save the traveling time of the people, especially those who are traveling a long distance daily to reach their work place. If they reach on time, the productivity in the company will increase. Similarly, employees can enjoy a happy family life by sending their quality time with their dear ones. For example, with the introduction of metro rails in Cochin, India, show that, the number of people who travelling in the high-speed train is increasing daily as same as the revenue. The spending money to build high-speed rails will not be a wrong decision, hence the extra earnings can be used for the development of existing public transportation.
On the other hand, instead of sending on high-speed rails, this money should be spent to upbringing the already existing transportation system. In other words, although high speed rails are expensive, this money could be used to expand the roads, to improve the facilities in existing trains or buses, or even can introduce many more buses as well as trains to accommodate more commuters.
In my opinion, although high speed rails are expensive, it brings many benefits to the commuters and government. Since government can use the income which generated from high-speed rail system, to improve the quality of existing public transportation.
In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that, even though new developments are necessary, we should not forget to improve the already existing facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The pie charts show a comparison of different kynds of energy production in france in 2 years. 56
- Some people argue that all governments should spend a good amount of money for space researches. But some others argue that this money should be spent for meeting the basic needs on earth. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 84
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed.What is the reason for doing this?Is this a negative or positive development? 73
- Table and notes below give information about student enrollments at Brighton Co ed Secondary school a privately run fee paying institute in 1990 2000 and 2010 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
...l projects. To begin with, there are many reason to support the view since spending a go...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me, the productivity in the company will increase. Similarly, employees can enjoy...
^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accommodating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accommodating
...oduce many more buses as well as trains to accommodate more commuters. In my opinion, alth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, similarly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05917159763 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80318535145 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505917159763 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7250721402 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223933252863 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819774788019 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709647559142 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130690379075 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597554067874 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.