ecoturism
Both of the passage and the lecture talk about the eco-tourism. How it would positively influence the natural location and the local people. But in the lecture, the women disagree with the passage that only mention the pros of the eco-tourism. She stick on her idea of, everything have a positive and negative effect.
First in the listening the women agree with the fact that eco-tourism would have less impact than normal tourism; but the infrastructure needed for this will cause some damage anyway and this will cost air and water pollution.
Moreover in professor also mention the illegal hunting. The government saying that they will protect the area does not mean it will not have any illegal hunting. The worst of it, these road that were made for the tourist to get an easy access to the area make it easier for illegal hunting.
Lastly the passage also talk about benefit for the local people. These people are not benefit by the eco tourism, because the jobs that are offer to locals generally are not well paid. Also the cultural pollution is a problem.
To sum up no matter what kind of tourism, there will be damage no matter what, there is no perfect solution for a good development.
- watching movies is more enjoyable than reading books 93
- A new acquaintance of yours is thinking about studying your native language. How would you convince him or her that this would be a good decision? Use specific reasons and details in your response. 61
- comics 80
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to suppo
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the passage and the lecture talk about the eco-tourism. How it would positively...
^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'sticks'.
Suggestion: sticks
...ention the pros of the eco-tourism. She stick on her idea of, everything have a posit...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...ct. First in the listening the women agree with the fact that eco-tourism would have less impact than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...his will cost air and water pollution. Moreover in professor also mention the illegal h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...d that were made for the tourist to get an easy access to the area make it easier for illegal ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 186, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... to locals generally are not well paid. Also the cultural pollution is a problem. T...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, lastly, moreover, so, well, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75714285714 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36530573115 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7778423772 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.25 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.