Line graph : car exports in three regions from 2013 to 2017.
The figure elucidates the amount of the exports of car in three different areas between 2013 and 2017. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the number of car exports in the UK and it is measured in units per thousand.
To begin with, there was a remarkable upsurge in the total of the export of the car in USA between 2013, which made up at just below a half of 10, and 2014, which constituted at well under two-tenths of 100. In the next 2 years, it remained stable, and unexpectedly it plunged dramatically, plummeting to well beneath 10. In regard to other regions, the car exports in EU, initially, experienced an immense fluctuation over the entire period where it, initially, upright positioned at two-thirds of 45 and terminated to five-tenths of 80 in 2017.
In contrast, 2013 to 2014 witnessed a marginal drop in the UK in which it stood roughly at 20 in 2013 and achieved to just well beyond a third of 30 in 2014. Afterwards, it climbed tremendously, jumping to just less than eight times of 5 by the end of the period shown.
- Films and games can be accessed at any time from mobile devices like smartphones, tablets and laptop computers.Do the advantages of such development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Source of complaints and average time from investigation data to final action 94
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
- Housing and accommodation has become a major problem in many countries around the world What are some of the main factors that have contributed to this problem What can be done to help reducing the number of homeless people 89
- The graph below shows the purchasing of petrol by people from the United States and United Kingdom according to their salaries. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...inated to five-tenths of 80 in 2017. In contrast, 2013 to 2014 witnessed a marg...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, third, well, in contrast, in regard to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55384615385 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77785930189 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.6217664466 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210723028102 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100919044078 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105537163053 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150615626896 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088095276119 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.