As countries develop, their populations tend to live individually or in small
family units. In your opinion, what is this cause and what are the effects on
society?
It is increasingly common that families are currently declining in their sizes. The aims of this essay is to highlight primary factors leading to this trend and predict its potential social consequences.
There are several reasons responsible for the fact that people prefer living in smaller family units compared to the past. Firstly, it is obvious that individualism is gaining more popularity, especially among younger people. The youth are likely to prefer staying by their own and freely doing what interests them rather than being restricted to the traditional responsibility of raising a family. Take my sister, who has a passion for traveling and shopping but not for marrying or bring children up, as an example. Another important cause worth mentioning is the cost. There is no doubt that the living cost of a nuclear family, which has only two generations, including parents and their offspring, is far affordable than that of an extended family, having a number of generations living under the same roof.
Various problems, both welcoming and unwelcoming, relating to this tendency are anticipated. If more and more people choose to pursue a single life, this inevitably triggers a decline in the birth rate. As a result, an ageing population is expected, leading to a shortage of productive and energetic workers. A telling example is Japan, which is facing with consequences of accelerating number of elderly people, this country has to import foreign labours to fulfil the employment demand of nursing. Nevertheless, raising a miniature household can ensure a better living standard for every member. In earlier times, it was common for a family with five to ten children, and may be due to this, the rate of illiteracy was significant at that time.
In conclusion, there are a host of reasons behind this trend and it causes both favourable and unfavourable impacts on society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-24 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 73
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The figure below is a town planning map Showing the likely position of new shopping centers as well as the various different zones and major transportation route of the town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 80
- Some people think that robots are very important for humans' future development. Others, however, think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ecially among younger people. The youth are likely to prefer staying by their own a...
^^^
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...that time. In conclusion, there are a host of reasons behind this trend and it cau...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17532467532 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90192182498 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626623376623 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1750176782 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.266666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162739015797 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454443292707 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0207558763602 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872908120023 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147054668627 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.