The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line chart compares the quantity of four kinds of food eaten by one person in a week over a period of 25 years.
It is noticeable that meat consumption saw considerable changes over the period shown. Fish consumption, however, remained relatively stable.
In 1979, beef was the most popular food, with approximately 220 grams every week. Lamb consumption was slightly more than that of chicken but after one year they reached the same point. The consumption of fish was the least, only 60 grams eaten by one person per week.
Between 1979 and 2004, the amount of chicken consumed rose dramatically to about 250 grams in 2004, overtaking beef as the biggest one. By contrast, the figure for lamb fell greatly by 90 grams. Beef saw a small rise to 240 grams after 1980 and then declined to 100 grams. In 1989, beef and chicken were consumed equally. Fish remained relatively stable, at between 40 and 60 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to plan and organize. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 66
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving collage in 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The first below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household.The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81132075472 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51514144215 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.902231947 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.5454545455 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4545454545 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151633983767 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548587167399 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460281654647 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852032440102 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310287682125 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.