The diagrams below illustrate changes affected in the district park between 2004 and 2014.
The maps compare the alteration which occurred in the district park from 2004 through to 2014. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the enhancement of car park in comparison with other alterations.
To begin with the north part of the park, the existence of tennis courts, car park and children’s play area has been expanded into a larger building in 2014. To the south of children’s play area, there was a new children’s soft play area which has been developed in the next 10 years. In contrast, the presence of football ground and the entrance remained unchanged over the entire period.
In accordance with the other changes, 2004 to 2014 witnessed the replacement of the green area which was minimized in 2014 where it has been replaced by new toilets and smaller green area where there was a new café inside new green area. To the west of the green area, the position of pond in 2004 was altered by new boating area in which it was located in the east of new picnic area by the end of the period shown.
- More and more young people from wealthy nations are doing unpaid work in poorer nations. What are the reasons and who benefits more from this: the communities or young people? 84
- Government should focus spending only on public services, not waste on the arts. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some of people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Bar Chart : The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65608465608 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63754358303 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0106563346 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133071057839 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769044291581 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770549618824 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11024327118 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725267347024 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.