In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
In a number of countries some people think it as necessary to spend huge sums of money on constructing new railway lines for faster travel while other believe on spending money to improve existing public transport.
In my opinion both the statements are correct. However, my opinion is based on various factors such as economy of a country, room for improvement of existing transport, need of new transport system or not and so on.
If we are going to spend money to improve existing public transport then we are clearly stating that those systems have become outdated and need to be updated in terms of speed of travel, comfort, ease of access, capacity and timings. If we are lacking anywhere in these areas and any other that might come to mind, then yes, we should spend money on improvements rather than constructing new ones, otherwise not.
However, spending huge sums of money on constructing new railway lines should be our last resort. It should be done only after we are sure that the existing public transport can not be improved any further and that we have hit a wall. Not only that but we should also keep in mind that not all countries can afford building new rail roads. Building anything country wide puts a lot of pressure on country's economy. Getting faster transport at the cost of country's economy is not a brilliant idea.
For instance, countries like France and Spain have technology and wealth to make hyper loops but they stuck to the idea of improving existing technology. This is because they knew that constructing new rail lines will be like drainage of country's wealth.
To sum up, i would say that any country should pen down their options with an open mind but choose the one which suits them in a longer run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. 67
- Now a days people throw away old things and adopt new. Do the disadvantages of throw away society outweigh any possible economic advantages. 84
- You and your family went to a restaurant one night The next day the whole family fell sick with food poisoning Complain to the manager about the whole issue 75
- You want to apply for following job. Write a letter to Mr Moore describing your previous experience and explaining why you would be suitable for the job. Waiter/waitress required for evening work. Some experience would be necessary. 73
- For the past year you have been a member of a local club. Now you want to discontinue your membership. Write letter to the club Secretary.In your letter-State what type of membership you haveHave have you paidGive details of how you benefited from the cl 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to build'.
Suggestion: to build
... mind that not all countries can afford building new rail roads. Building anything count...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 12, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...inage of countrys wealth. To sum up, i would say that any country should pen d...
^
Line 11, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e one which suits them in a longer run.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74509803922 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45921926814 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552287581699 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6719158985 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.692307692 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390659622532 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139840161407 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157684841507 0.0667982634062 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214159434507 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184316152166 0.056905535591 324% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.