In companies, promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company, not to someone from outside or new hiring. Do you agree or disagree?
It is considered that old employees of the firm should be moved up in ranking rather than promoting fresh staff or outside person. I am in complete consummate accord with this point as it is much better to shift existing persons to higher position than hiring someone new and moving him/her up in hierarchy.
Advancement of insider employees is much more fruitful for number of reasons. The preponderant one is appreciation of their contribution - in form of time, effort, patience and loyalty - toward the company as they are working in company long before the new ones. To cite an example, Blizzard Entertainment - a gaming company - often emphasize on promotion from within as compared to outside hires, in respect and praise of their work. Another reason to do it is to give rise to emotions of encouragement and hope in the other employees that if they work, they can also achieve higher ranking. For instance, leading sports industry known as "Stats", tends to keep a supportive and encouraging atmosphere for employees by empowering them more.
An another aspect to be considered is the experience that older employees harbours in comparison to the fresh workers. To instantiate, whenever it comes to finding an experienced, there is no one better the old persons who have gone through different stages of life.
No doubt, hiring new employees and promoting them sound good and right as they have modern ideas and knowledge. However, this does not help them in any way to adopt to new workplace and bring erratic results to company just after they join.
To conclude, I firmly believe that ranking up the workers from within the organizations is much more advantages than hiring fresh recruit s.
- The number of people at risk of serious health problem due to overweight is increasing. What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society? What can be done to solve the issue? 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat Write a letter to your neighbours In your letter explain the reasons for the noise apologise describe what action 73
- Some people believe that travelling alone really benefits in learning a country's culture and experience while others believe it is better to travel with someone you know. Discuss both views and share your opinion. 73
- There have been some problems with the bus service especially its reliability in your area over the last two weeks Write a letter to the manager of the bus company In your letter describe what the problems are explain how these problems are affecting you 84
- Some people are making new friends by socializing network websites and internet chat rooms Some people say that this is a good thing Other people opine that people should make new friends by face to face chat Discuss both views and given your own opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'an aspect' or 'another aspect'.
Suggestion: An aspect; Another aspect
...r employees by empowering them more. An another aspect to be considered is the experience that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
..., this does not help them in any way to adopt to new workplace and bring erratic results...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05985915493 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87333679414 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598591549296 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3951762861 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.75 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176942820931 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627104198519 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438407085506 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840759977708 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465824497637 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.