Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Nature is resilient and has survived for over billions of years, however it seems as though the aftermath of the industrial revolution and a recent growth in technology has endangered natural habitats throughout the world. While developments can benefit nations, we must be cognizant of irreversible damage that can be an effect of economic greed. New developments can also provide gains for the economy without destroying nature’s pure state.
Some of the most traveled to areas around the world are visited because of their historic nature and natural beauty. The national forest in Yosemite, CA is a great example of a wilderness area that is protected by laws to preserve its natural state, as much as possible. The ending caveat however implies that there must be room for the development of highways, tunnels, and hotel establishments in order for travelers to
We must also remember that Rome was not built in a day. While thousands of years ago, civilians might have considered the development of a massive coliseum in middle of such a small nation. The preservation of wilderness area might be more important to smaller nations such as Rome, when compared to China; However, there should be leeway in the consideration of developing property regardless of the limited amount of wilderness area available. Now the rundown development is what continues to bring economic wealth to Rome, until this day.
Nonetheless, we should also consider ethical standards when it comes to the discussion of economic gain. The development of the North Dakota pipeline in the United States is a great example of the need to propose a law to preserve the historic nature of North Dakota, where Native American burial grounds are known to be. The prosperity that a new oil pipeline can bring to the United States is beyond millions to billions of dollars; however, Native American history has never had a strong influence in American education and is therefore often taken for granted. In this case, the economic gain does not supersede the value of one of the very few remaining Native American burial grounds.
To conclude, there should be a deep consideration to preserve nations some nations wilderness areas with the idea of possible developments that could bring economic gain. The placement of a tunnel in Yosemite national park and a few hotel establishments does not imply that the entire forest will be endangered. Therefore, nations should consider laws to preserve wilderness areas, but also consider possible development as long as there are ethical standards being applied.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- A memorandum was written by a TV station to devote more time to local news and weather programs in order to increase advertising revenue. 55
- Nations should require a national educational curriculum 54
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 73
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...estroying nature's pure state. Some of the most traveled to areas around the world...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...establishments in order for travelers to We must also remember that Rome was not ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conomic wealth to Rome, until this day. Nonetheless, we should also consider eth...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... consideration to preserve nations some nations wilderness areas with the idea of possi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84969167286 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502380952381 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2506097525 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0625 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338717411047 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112115927601 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648088380842 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19129234447 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477841783942 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.