The plans compare the changes of the Grange Park between when it first opened in 1920 and today.
In general, since 1920, the park underwent a total transformation in terms of modernisation.
As can be clearly seen, the plans show that a rose garden has been removed and another has been moved to the center where a fountain used to be. All the seats in the park has been rid of and placed around the central rose garden. By the entrance from Arnold Avenue, a rose garden was demolished to make way for a cafe. To the east of the cafe, there is a children's play area, built where the pond for water plants was situated. Opposite the play area, a new addition to the park is the water feature, replacing a glasshouse and to the east is where people would enter from the underground car park. On the west side of the park, the old stage for musicians was deconstructed and instead is upgraded to a brand new amphitheatre for concerts.
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the ma 73
- As computers are being used more and more in education, there will soon be no role for the teacher in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart shows the end of year value for four major international money market indices from 2002 to 2008. [Dow Jones = US Market Index, DAX 30 = German Market Index, CAC 40 = French Market Index, KOSPI = Korean Market Index]Summarise the information by s 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45930232558 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51240163578 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9371737978 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20374913202 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934143939822 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837957837251 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174232503685 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895312948263 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.