It goes without saying that, we live in an age when although the population on the earth is grown compared to past time, the size of families is dwindled. This is because of differences in the lifestyle of two mentioned periods. The structure of living in the ancient time was based on agriculture which required the whole family members endeavor. Hence, having an extended family contributed to having extra power, wealth and reputation. Oppositely, nowadays the size of family is not appreciably a deciding factor. They have been proposed some other elements for qualifying whether a family is prospered or not, including: the level of education, adherence to the law and nobility.
Furthermore, unlike the past, the family income does not come from arm force which automatically acts as a hinder agent to have extra offspring. Enlarging the household equals with addition in demands. Indeed, yet the parents bears the expenses of children to almost being mature, whereas before 20th century children supported family from financial aspects since infantile time.
In addition, the hectic life caused to have less opportunity to being in close contact with our distant relatives. This ensue to choose the solitude and avoid from gathering and celebrate frequently, issues that cherished once by extended families.
Following the previous contents, restricting relations to borders of siblings (sibling range), implies limiting our pleasures which can be attain nowhere else. Suppose one getting ill or falling in to trouble, in that time our relatives would be the first and the best companions. Some sociologists believes that emerge of technological and scientific advancements have brought special features for our relationships substitution, features like social media.
All things considered, changing living habits and interests provokes parents to be reluctant for childbearing. Children rather than undertaking family responsibility, themselves is going to become a part of problems. Adding this not having enough time for spending visiting distant relatives as well as having other recreations, consequences fall the importance of extended family.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following the statement?Being creative rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution a problem. 90
- Which of the following do you think contribute most to an enjoyable vacation:1. good food 2. good location 3. good friends to travel with. Select one and giveyour reasons. 81
- Some people like to work at home, while others prefer to work in the office. Which do you prefer and why 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, Professional athletes, such football and basketball player, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ation on the earth is grown compared to past time, the size of families is dwindled. This...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'believe'.
Suggestion: believe
... the best companions. Some sociologists believes that emerge of technological and scient...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, whereas, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93790656431 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653495440729 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5482096182 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.823529412 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139260846619 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406909933416 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349889526545 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698948452682 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432314703972 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.