Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
it is always a debatable question that how traffic congestion and accommodation issues can be resolved effectively. Owing to this, few people deem that it could be solved by shifting big organizations and industries to the rural areas with their staff-members. I partially agree with this notion because it will not address the problem totally which I will elucidate in following paragraphs.
The primary reason to concur with the credence is that rudimentary cause for the traffic jam and housing is over-populated cities. When large companies and manufacturing units will be moved to countryside which is less dense, population in urban region will be decreased automatically. Consequently, people will have not have to face plight by waiting hours to reach at their destination. To exemplify, in India, Government has made industrial areas in the outskirt of the cities due to which traffic and problems related to accommodation are untangled at certain level. However, it is not guaranteed that problem will be solved absolutely.
nevertheless, country side is lesser contaminated than cities and it is an inhabitant of various wild as well as domestic animals which are inherent part of eco-system. Therefore, if large companies establish their units in these locations then existence of difference creatures will be in jeopardy that is undesirable. As a result, people will have to face unwanted crisis due to disturbance of food chain. There will be a dearth of agricultural land as it is utilized for production. Thus, instead of procuring rural land for industries, it would be a better option to find out other alternatives.
To recapitulate, though issues of traffic and housing could be resolved by transferring mammoth plants and its workers to country side, I believe that peril to wild-life and agricultural space cannot be neglected. Furthermore, it is recommended that before making any decision, authority should circumspect all the facets of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-02 | ratnumohit | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | nmily89 | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | nmily89 | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-16 | thanhvan9893 | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-16 | thanhvan9893 | 73 | view |
- Some people think the government should be responsible for solving the pollution problems which results from heavy traffic.To what extent do you agree? 73
- Essay Usually directors are paid much higher salaries than ordinary workers Some people agree with this but others believe it is unfair Discuss both the views and give your opinion on this topic 86
- What distinguishes young people from their parents or grandparents generation is a lack of physical exercise Today s generation are spending far too long playing computer games chatting aimlessly on social networking sites or simply watching TV and too li 89
- You have a Facebook friend living and he/she is curious to learn about a major news item in your country.write a letter to your Facebook friend. In your letter,describe a news story in your countryexplain why people are interested in itsay how the story p 78
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea, some think that they should be banned.Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is always a debatable question that how...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...lly. Consequently, people will have not have to face plight by waiting hours to reac...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...t problem will be solved absolutely. nevertheless, country side is lesser contaminated th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3536977492 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19785225327 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585209003215 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3304926484 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237163528534 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746102671718 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514139675636 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142340510193 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551058360043 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.