tpo 8 the Chevalier
The material discusses the concept of the accuracy of the Chevalier’s memoir. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective. The reading challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding the topic, namely the Chevalier was not rich as he borrowed sums of money from a merchant. Next, he could not remember the conversation with Voltaire, because it was many years ago. Finally, the story of escaping him from the notorious prison is not logic.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is borrowing money did not mean he was poor, the Chevalier might have properties have to sell first, but it took time to sell. So, he borrowed money and waited from his money to arrive. In addition to that, he could remember the conversation between him and the Voltaire, because he wrote this conversations night by night. One final point, old Venice government stated that the ceiling of the prison had to repair. Therefore, why they needed to repair it unless the Chevalier escaped.
In summary, there are discrepancies in the information presented.
- people benefit more from traveling in their own countries than from traveling to foreign countries? agree or disagree? 88
- parent today do not have enough time to spend with their kids it is better to spend that time playing=g games or sprots with their kids , other people believe that they should spend time doing things related to schoolwork? 60
- young people nowadays do not have enough time to help their communites 76
- tpo 54 3
- tpo 10 the decline of sea otters along Alaska coast 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ccuracy of the Chevalier's memoir. While the reading looks at the topic from one...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ints outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom the notorious prison is not logic. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 186.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24193548387 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88268821015 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60752688172 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1336333059 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.25 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102901389021 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410374067821 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613077787171 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561013317231 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331789732272 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.