Comparison of author's and lecturer's view on Stein's writing.
The lecture states that the students might have read the essay and understood that the author of the essay did not like Gertrude Stein. The author states that Stein did not communicate her thoughts and emotions well in her writing as she did not use punctuation well. The lecture disagrees with this thought and mentions that the author has not read her Poetry which leads the writers to use the punctuation well.
The lecturer states that Stein focussed on the sounds of the words to make it more interesting and dramatic. The lecturer says that reliability on sounds of words is not wrong and it actually helps readers to see better. This is in disagreement with the essay which mentions that she did not focus on the meanings of the words at all and did not show any clear emotion or meaning.
The lecturer and the passage both agree that Stein was often visited by many renowned artists. The lecturer mentions that Ernest Hemingway spent a lot of time with her and she left a deep impact on Ernest's thinking. The lecturer states that Stein changed the way people were thinking in their timing which helped the artists to produce better writing. However, the passage states that they were merely social connections and that cannot be considered more valuable than the word produced by the artist. The passage states that Stein did not achieve any historical significance or make any impact by meeting these renowned artists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | Feragafor. | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | its.shelly.agarwal | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Milipatel | 76 | view |
- Schoolds should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when the school buildings are in repair. 50
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. 58
- Comparison of author's and lecturer's view on Stein's writing. 70
- If two applicants for a job are equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng as she did not use punctuation well. The lecture disagrees with this thought and...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...iters to use the punctuation well. The lecturer states that Stein focussed on ...
^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... make it more interesting and dramatic. The lecturer says that reliability on sound...
^^^
Line 9, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...left a deep impact on Ernests thinking. The lecturer states that Stein changed the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84552845528 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35285451816 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.4552171844 49.2860985944 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.363636364 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 7.06452816374 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125490450842 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570580470493 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372859313298 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867984479834 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216307487392 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.