Generally, family is considered as the backbone of a society. A section of society opt to live in nuclear families whereas, some others opine that it is ideal to belong in a large group of family. An attempt is made here to analyse both the views along with my opinion in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, small family units usually include three to four members which enable them to easily look after each other. In other words, a family consisting of parents and children manage to do things by their own. To give a clear example, in most nuclear families, both the parents would be working people which naturally force their children to be independent. Apart from that, there is enough time for the parents to mingle with their children due to fewer members in the family.Children can talk freely with their parents and can tackle their probems with the help of assistance and guidance from proginators. Therefore, emotions, bonding between guardians and offsprings would be much stronger and long lasting.
Furthermore, living in extended family increases the chance of distinct opinions and interest due to large number of members. This can lead to conflicts between the family members. At the same time, even though there is sharing among the group, parents would not get sufficient time to give special attention to their children. The influence of parents over their children is less compared to large families. This can in turn result in less interpersonal relationship between parent and child.
Finally, both type of families have their own benefits. A small family can raise independent individuals while, a large family can develop sharing mentality and communication skills among the children.
To recapitulate, after analysing both the arguments,I came to the conclusion that it is not the type of family that matters but, the attachment and bonding they share with each other. In today's busy life, it is the responsibility of parents to ensure that they spend enough time with their loved ones.
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem. What causes of the increased demand, and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to th 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and vie your own opinion. 73
- The two pie charts show the types of communication used in 1962 and 1982. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparation where relevant. 73
- Eventhough globalization affects the world's economic in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Children
...dren due to fewer members in the family.Children can talk freely with their parents and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...late, after analysing both the arguments,I came to the conclusion that it is not t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, whereas, while, apart from, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07807807808 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68631669363 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546546546547 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1456843384 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4705882353 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235271005171 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853243383562 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693512066586 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153553229113 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733221322034 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.