In many countries, the cost of living is rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? What measures can be taken to deal with this problem?
Nowadays, in many countries, there has a trend growing in living expenditure, sometimes out of governments' control. It causes some bad effects on both citizens and societies. But I believe that measures can be found and tackle to solve this problem.
Rising in living cost, especially in big cities causes some bad consequences. In terms of individuals, people will have many difficulties to make ends meet because they have to pay higher price for daily necessities. That means they must make cutbacks their consume on entertainment, healthcare or education. In social perspectives, that trend results in occur of socio-economic changes that economy goes into decline as people pay in arrears or go into debt. Moreover, social issues such as theft, violence increase if people have to anything to afford basic needs or in urgent situation because they cannot save money before.
Having awareness of these effects, we have to find solutions to reduce drawbacks of expensive living cost and solutions mainly come from actions of governments. Firstly, they can provide public subsidies for basic needs to mitigate financial pressure for their citizens. For instance, governments in some countries in Europe like Germany, Sweden or Switzerland budget for free medical care their people. Secondly, authorities should considerate to curb public spending on military weapons and prioritize expenditure on social welfare. Lastly, method has remarkable results is adopting reduced taxes policies. It will suddenly decrease price of many goods and services in society.
In conclusion, rising cost of living create hardships for many individuals and economy. Governments must adopt measures to help those in society who are in the most need.
- Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits, and TV channels.Do the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages? 67
- The graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007. 67
- Water is natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph shows the average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone services. 61
- In recent years there has been growing interest in relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high level of personal achievement are possible on 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49442379182 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86747977583 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654275092937 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1292923125 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.375 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16021056294 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539873300932 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663215860616 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12593062654 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08800170815 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.