Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little that can be done to rectify this.
Without a doubt, the media can have a massive influence on the way individuals think and alter their behavior. Consequently, whoever is in charge can use this tool to control everyone. Many people believe that preventing this issue is not possible. However, nowadays, people have become more self-aware and can not be deceived easily. Also, there are some approaches to curb the influences of media on people, such as independent media outlets and better education.
The reason why the media can not control individuals like before is the enhancement of the way they think. One of these enhancements is that they know almost all of the media's tricks and lies. In result, people do not trust the media and are not going to change their own opinions. Another factor keeping people from changing their ideas is having a vast amount of knowledge around different subjects. Nowadays, with the help of the internet, people can access any information and figure out if they are fake or not.
There are several solutions possible to limit the impact of media on people. First, we must invest in independent networks to distribute this power through various companies. Thus, there will be different points of view to follow. Second, we should enhance the education system, so that, individuals could defend their ideas against others. Also, this would help them to do not let external forces, such as the media, negatively affect them.
In summary, there is no denying in power of the media to change people's idea and mindset. However, this can be prevented by the help of independent media sources and better education. Also, people are not gullible like the past and can not be persuaded to change their mindset.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-26 | cocolico14 | 61 | view |
| 2016-02-29 | mahsaj1985 | 70 | view |
- The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992 2000 Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate 47
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 73
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e enhancements is that they know almost all of the medias tricks and lies. In result, peop...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, thus, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03146853147 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54910452597 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559440559441 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9447702807 49.4020404114 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.9444444444 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31999872017 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993718192329 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648699527899 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203614672823 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746873377217 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.