The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.
The line chart illustrates a comparison of various places in their export of wheat. Also, the data had been gathered throughout the years from 1985 to 1990.
It can be depicted that both Australia and European countries had less variation in their export amount. Conversely, there is a rapid fluctuation in the number of wheat exports in Canada through these 5 years.
In the beginning, the European Community and Australia start at approximately 17 and exactly 15 millions of tonnes respectively. Afterward, Australia had reached a peak of around 16 million in 1986 then dropped in value in the following years and ended up at slightly above 10 million in 1990. On the other hand, in the year 1986, the European Community decreased by near 4 million. Subsequently, it had a static value in the years from 1986 to 1988 around 15 million. This followed by a sudden increase in 1988 and ended up at about more than 20 million in 1990.
Canada started at nearly 20 million and it had the most amount of exports compare to the other two areas. Afterward, there are some fluctuations in the next five years. The maximum amount of export is in 1988 and the minimum amount is in the following year. It is after this year that European Community dominates Canada in the number of wheat exports. After the year 1989, there is another rise in value resulting in less than 20 millions of tonnes in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | Sagar Gurung | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | ssb | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | farzad.rahmati_1989 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | Theagh | 73 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. 78
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write in newspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think we become used to bad news? Should more good news be reported? 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 73
- The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992 2000 Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...a start at approximately 17 and exactly 15 millions of tonnes respectively. Afterward, Austral...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 429, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...er rise in value resulting in less than 20 millions of tonnes in 1990.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74693877551 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62163490898 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9386972179 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0714285714 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.047884858727 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219529491914 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281801217696 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0428009184586 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256376120241 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.