Many important discoveries or creations are
accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to
one question that we come across the answer to
another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to
which you agree or disagree with the statement and
explain your reasoning for the position you take. In
developing and supporting your position, you should
consider ways in which the statement might or might
not hold true and explain how these considerations
shape your position.
The speaker asserts that many important discoveries or creations are accidental and people usually come across the answer to one question when they seek the answer to another. It is true that some discoveries are fortuitous, while there are sill some other intentional discoveries. In my perspective, the statement may raise valid points under certain scenarios. However, it may be tenuous under other conditions.
Many discoveries occur unexpectedly in our quest for something else, such as an answer to an unrelated question or a solution to an unrelated problem. For instance, Columbus discovered the new continent during his way to find India. Fleming, a great chemist, fortuitously find penicillin when he did research on unrelated bacteria named staphylococci, which has been considered as one of the greatest discovery till now. And the famous beverage company, Coca cola, was a company which sold dilute linctus before a researcher of this company accidentally created this tasty beverage. Other than the aforementioned three examples, there are a myriad of examples of the unexpected discoveries when people seek for the answer to unrelated questions. Under these scenarios, the statement may be valid.
However, never can we take the statement to the extreme. There are still numerous discoveries or creations are goal oriented and are accomplished after long-time assiduous researches or experiments. For example, Madame Curie, a laureate of the Nobel Prize, had devoted herself to the experiments for a long time before she successfully refined radium, which made her become the greatest chemist in the worldwide. Another laureate of the Nobel Prize, Tu Youyou, discovered artemisinin which can be used to treat malaria after doing research in the laboratory for several years. Both of their discoveries are not accidental. Instead, they are intentional and should be attributed to the long-time endeavor of the two chemists.
Overall, some discoveries or creations may accidentally occur when people seek for the answer to other questions, while others may be goal oriented and they should be attributed to the long-time researches or experiments on them. Therefore, the statement is convincing under some scenarios, while it is too extreme under other conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sports teach people lessons about life. 86
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals."One year ago we introduced our first product, Bargain Brand breakfast cereal. Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the topselling cereal compan 69
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In de 75
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 87
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...rementioned three examples, there are a myriad of examples of the unexpected discoveri...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49575070822 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02453274294 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532577903683 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.5333125873 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224811208052 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701718846504 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861412628759 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146681147116 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675082365158 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.