Living in big cities is bad for people’s health. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that urban life has a negative impact on inhabitant’s health. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether this statement is well-founded. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I completely concur with this proposition due to the hazards of existing environment and traffic problems of big cities to people’s well-being.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that air quality plays a pivotal role in people’s health. However, this element is becoming worse in most of the metropolises all over the globe due to industrial production and traffic activities. Every day, the inhabitant of big cities inhale a big amount of carbon dioxide emissions and atmospheric pollutants released by industrial factories and vehicles. As a result, there is an increasing number of people living in metropolises having respiratory diseases and lung cancer.
Equally importantly, noise pollution in urbans is also another considerable threat to people’s health. People living in big cities have to daily undergo a variety types of noise ranging from the noise of vehicles, construction activities to the roar of diesel engines, which can cause them tired, easily irritable, and will lead to mental diseases in the long run.
On the contrary with popular consensus that urban inhabitants have a better health care systems than their peers in countrysides due to modern infrastructure. A lot of metropolises in the world, developing countries in particular, are struggling with serious traffic jam, this poses a lot of difficulties and takes much time for emergency patient, which should be done speedily. In Ho Chi Minh City, for example, the scene of ambulances stuck in traffic congestion during peak hours is normal in this 13 milion-inhabitant metropolis.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my position that urban life imperils people’s health because of its air and noise pollution as well as the impediment of traffic jam to emergency patient process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-17 | dusdbv3 | view | |
| 2024-10-08 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-08-21 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
- These days, the gap between the rich and the poor is steadily increasing, thus affecting negatively the lives of millions. Why is this happening? What can be done to reduce it? 78
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 73
- Living in big cities is bad for people’s health. Do you agree or disagree? 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...h. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether this statement is well-founded. While t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...respiratory diseases and lung cancer. Equally importantly, noise pollution in urbans ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well, while, as to, for example, in particular, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40634920635 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24475816208 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8180146254 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23316113958 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812977846633 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518666898589 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129545981442 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460995645312 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.