Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
The author states that “the education institution has responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing a field of study in which they likely to succeed” in my opinion it seems equivocal to me as it might turn out to fruitful or it may lead to detrimental effects.
Firstly, if teacher is given responsibility to dissuade student, there might be a chance that teacher might misconstrue the real potential of the students and dissuade him or her from the subjects which can turn out fruitful to them, for instance taking an example of Michael Jordan a paragon of basketball aspirant was dissuade from his school basketball team, it might be possible that at some instances teacher might misinterpret the real potential of the students which eventually have a deleterious effect.
Secondly, if teacher interpret student potential wisely then it turns out to be boon for student as they dedicate most of the time horn their area of interest and ignoring the subjects which have no importance to their interest, for instance taking an example of students who have interest in boxing can dedicate most of time to practice the moves which eventually helps him to be a good boxer rather than dedicated to the subject which has no relevance to his interest.
Thirdly, the teacher is an integral part of student life which help him to become a most accomplished person and help to get an insight of life by his experiences and understanding for life as whole teacher always want their student to be best but ignoring the student real interest that for some instances teacher may misinterpret which may turn deleterious
Conclusively, education institutions are an integral part of student life, giving them the responsibility of dissuade students from subject they are unlikely to succeed, seems logical at first glance but ignoring the instances of misinterpretation and students real interest authors claim cant hold water.
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability ofhumans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of thesocieties and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibilityof corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as m 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful 63
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The author states that 'the educati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dissuaded'.
Suggestion: dissuaded
...an a paragon of basketball aspirant was dissuade from his school basketball team, it mig...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instances'' or 'instance's'?
Suggestion: instances'; instance's
...team, it might be possible that at some instances teacher might misinterpret the real pot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents which eventually have a deleterious effect. Secondly, if teacher interpret...
^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his interest. Thirdly, the teacher is an integral part of student life which ...
^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dly, the teacher is an integral part of student life which help him to become a ...
^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t but ignoring the student real interest that for some instances teacher may misi...
^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instances'' or 'instance's'?
Suggestion: instances'; instance's
...he student real interest that for some instances teacher may misinterpret which may turn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nd students real interest authors claim cant hold water.
^^^^
Line 9, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...interest authors claim cant hold water.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15238095238 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95121328676 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463492063492 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.2370786517 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 78.0 23.0359550562 339% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 140.778860274 60.3974514979 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 405.75 118.986275619 341% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 78.75 23.4991977007 335% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 25.25 5.21951772744 484% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361741464392 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242921887371 0.0831039109588 292% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103207268986 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22870837417 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120290675435 0.0667264976115 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 42.2 14.1392134831 298% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -7.69 48.8420337079 -16% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.92365168539 201% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 33.7 12.1743820225 277% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.77 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.38706741573 126% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 11.8971910112 244% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 33.2 11.2143820225 296% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 34.0 11.7820224719 289% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.