The use of the mobile phone in certain places is just as antisocial as smoking. Do you think mobile should be banned like smoking?
The cell phone has significant development and using smart phone become as necessary as a part of our daily lives in recent years. Some people claimed that in a certain area using a mobile phone should be prohibited as smoking. This essay will argue that whether the mobile phone should be banned like smoking.
On the one hand, some people indicated that the mobile phone has become antisocial part in our daily lives. First of all, it is certainly dangerous if people cross the signal meanwhile watching the phone screen which maybe triggers an accident. In addition, incoming phone loud in a library or answer in the phone in certain public places will be a truly matter to other people. Therefore, using the phone has to be prohibited when driving and people also have to aware of the consequence when using the phone in certain areas and various circumstance.
On the other hand, the cell phone has played an important role in our everyday lives. It is true that the mobile phone has become an indispensable factor in communication. It is connected to each other wherever they are and not only the voice but also a video call is available now. Besides, the mobile phone has made life better and easier. For example, people would play phone games in their leisure time and shopping online if they prefer to stay at home. To brief, the advancing technology of the mobile phone has made people life convenient and efficient.
In conclusion, although cell phone not as harmful as smoking which also brings us many benefits, people still need to aware of some potential risks. This essay argued both the pro and cons when using the phone in particular situations. Personally, I strongly believe that a mobile phone should not be prohibited because it is not as antisocial as smoking.
- The bar chart below shows the money spent on consumer goods in different countries. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- Some people think everyone should be a vegetarian because we do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('truly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('matter') instead of another adjective.
... phone in certain public places will be a truly matter to other people. Therefore, using the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85064935065 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51516525281 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496753246753 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2106335227 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378377385466 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144433012891 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112880984562 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262298264681 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954823861351 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.