The line graph show three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005.
The line graph gives information about three kinds of crimes in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005. Overall, the number of crimes in three kinds decreased over the period of 35 years. The quantity of car thefts is highest among three different crimes, so it is the majority of crimes in England and Wale.
The trend of car theft and house burgling were similar during 35 years period. In which, from 1970 to 1980 there was a significant growth in car theft and house burgling. The number of car theft rose from 0.4 to 0.8 million, while house burgling grew from 0.2 to 0.4 million. Between 1980 and 1990, car theft saw a considerable rise to 1 million. House burgling remained stable at 0.6 million, then gradually grew to approximately 0.7 million. From 1990 to 2005, both car theft and house burgling fluctuated.
Street robbery stayed constant at about 0.1 million from 1970 to 1995. By contrast, 10 years later, a steep increase was seen in the number of street robberies to 0.2 million, then no change stability.
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 56
- The line graph show three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 67
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 56
- The car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2005. 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both view and give your opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74860335196 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40907173065 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.1781323416 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.2727272727 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214681888229 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100373079756 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16257149328 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190954559949 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.231187386392 0.0819641961636 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.