Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
The external appearance of the workers like dressing professionally is also one of the key factors in a few organisations. On the other hand, some organisations give preference to the quality of the work which they do than presenting themselves in terms of dressing. In my opinion, the quality of the work and dressing up both plays a significant role.
Everyone should be professional in their workplace. Dressing up smartly is also professional behaviour. One of the famous proverb "Face is the index of the mind" says that we can identify our mind through our face and appearance. Some people have the tendency to judge the people by an external appearance in their first sight. The organisation is the place to work so everyone should dress up neatly it will give the feel and comfortable to work. Some times our dress might distract others work. So everyone should be careful in choosing the dress. Some times client visit, meetings etc. may happen in our office aT that time our client might value our organisation by our external appearance.
On the other hand, some organisations prefer the quality of the work. Some think that skills or knowledge is enough to complete the task. People with this mindset will not give much importance to appearance. The true fact is that employees skill set is very important to complete the job. People with much work pressure that is employees working day and night might not have enough time to dress up neatly as professional. But their work will gain more profit for the organisation.
The organisation will examine the quality of the output done by the employees not the appearance to reward their work. There are still a few people who dont know to dress properly but they will have sound knowledge in all the fields. A few organisation will encourage and support these types of peoples.
In conclusion, It depends on the people mindset. In my view both values. They should dress up based on the occasion. For example: in the client meetings employees should dress smartly because the external appearance and quality of work both matters there.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | MustafaR | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 11 | view |
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or ex 91
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online.Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 91
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- Many businesses in the world today are run by family members Do the advantages of family run businesses outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experiences or knowledge 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have the tendency to judge the people by an external appearance in their first si...
^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
... be careful in choosing the dress. Some times client visit, meetings etc. may happen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Some times client visit, meetings etc. may happen in our office aT that time ou...
^^
Line 9, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ce to appearance. The true fact is that employees skill set is very important to complete...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 153, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... work. There are still a few people who dont know to dress properly but they will ha...
^^^^
Line 11, column 237, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun organisation seems to be countable; consider using: 'few organisations'.
Suggestion: few organisations
...ve sound knowledge in all the fields. A few organisation will encourage and support these types ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95786516854 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75515836458 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463483146067 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6128965404 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.6 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.24 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358151591701 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10388692625 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711184281052 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207171377653 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312684753928 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.