Do you agree or disagree: a person should never make an important decision alone.
From time to time all people throughout their lives face some difficult choices and problems, which should be treated and solved in their best way through serious approach. However, the question is, whether people should deal with such situations on their own or with the support of others. Though there are still various perceptions towards this topic, I am strongly of the opinion that decisions, especially important ones, should not be given an individual approach mainly for the reasons mentioned in the following body paragraphs.
To begin with, I would like to highlight a famous adage which claims “Two heads are better than one”. Personally speaking, I consider this saying to be completely precise, as I do believe that people are able to perform better and more accurate when they are united. This is mainly because everyone has different types of thinking, views and interpret particular situations in different ways. In other words, working in a group provides people with the opportunity to exchange their knowledge, come up with all possible solutions and through comprehensive debates and discussions find the best answers. Case in point : my family. In my family all important decisions, that concern all the members of the family, are being discussed together. First of all, each of us mentions some advantages and disadvantages of the issue. Then, we consider all available choices and solutions and only after that, does my father make a decision.
In addition, people usually make decisions on the spur of the moment and without any serious contemplation when they are supposed to do it alone. But when more people are aware of the problem, these people then are more inclined to make relevant and right decisions in order not to feel ashamed afterwards and harm others. For example, if I have some problems related to my business in the future, I will let my employees know about the whole situation and ask them to suggest some possible solutions for the situation. Otherwise, I might make some mistake and as a result, not only lose my reputation as a good leader, but also lose my reliability.
In the light of the reasons mentioned above, I will definitely declare that important decisions should always be made in a group, in order to be precise and not do harm to anybody.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Luis Cortes | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Bobby1987 | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ChristineSmb | 81 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Kamalkhan | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | jeffhjz | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree: The technology will greatly affect the quality of life of ou next generation. 88
- Foreign visitors should pay more money than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. 73
- Do you agree or disagree: the best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. 76
- Do you agree or disagree: students are more influenced by their teachers than by theri friends. 70
- IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDE HEALTHCARE TO EVERYONE LIVING IN THAT COUNTRY. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ious approach. However, the question is, whether people should deal with such sit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, then, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04675324675 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70282628745 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568831168831 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9635915209 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.4375 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148382919294 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450412018273 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508814317099 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962506412025 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033526074926 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.