The graph below shows the proportion of the population who use the Internet between 1999 and 2009 in three different countries.
This line chart illustrates the percentage of people in the USA, Canada and Mexico who using the Internet over 10 years period from 1999.
Looking at the information more detail, we can see that in 1999, the percentage of Internet users in America accounted for just under 25% while the Canada and Mexico people accounted for far less proportion, at 10% and 5% respectively. The proportion of the population who use the Internet increased dramatically all the way at the end of the period in the USA and Canada at around 70% for the former and 80% for the latter. It is, however, interesting to note that by the year 2002, the number of Canadian who using the Internet always lower than American, but it increased suddenly and continued to lead over the next 7 years.
By contrast, Mexico was developed slower than the other two nations. The proportion of Internet users in Mexico rose gradually over the 10 years period at just under 40% in 2009.
Overall, it is clear that although the Internet is increasingly popular in these countries, Mexico was always leading a lower percentage compared to the other developed countries.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population who use the Internet between 1999 and 2009 in three different countries 42
- Some people think everyone should be a vegetarian because we do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- Some people say the government should give the health care the first priorities some others believe there are more important priorities to spend the taxpayers money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91237113402 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66763409312 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7359378853 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.142857143 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194938096589 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941470343653 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050448842933 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120611064738 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027460096437 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.