public transported
The importance of governments build more roads to allow more vehicle which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion. There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact the governments build more roads to allow more vehicle improve the public transport. Consequently, governments all facilities provide for people roads. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that more roads to allow for vehicle owner or improve the public transport. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead. Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that governments duty more roads to allow for people because no chance accident Besides, more vehicle improve highway and railway etc. Hence, it is apparent why many are in against of this trend. According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of governments build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve of public transport are indeed too great to ignore.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
2023-05-06 | nganvuong | 55 | view |
2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1062, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... but one of the crucial effects is that governments duty more roads to allow for people bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68152112719 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529166666667 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6032401941 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132109541081 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619392633178 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102941440907 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132109541081 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.