Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
In the modern world film industry provides a tremendous service in the arena of entertainment and education. However loads of people adore films made by exterior directors and dislike national movies thro their law quality. It mostly occurs because of the modest budgets that are provided for shooting a movie, as authorities prefer to spare.
To begin with, most people would accept that any kind of film demands great money spending for stuff, famous actors, costumes or equipment. Local film companies as a rule are just starting their work and therefore cannot pretend to stable financial support from the government or sponsors. For instance, in Russia there are more than 50 movie companies and only 1 of them, Fond kino, is popular and well-known in Asia and part of Europe. So, no one wants to watch unknown and law quality films.
Another thing to be considered is that people, especially teenagers, strive to learn and watch something new, while local films are often of the same type and do not show anything fresh and modern. Foreign movies allow a person to plunge into the atmosphere of another country with its special language and lifestyle. For example, according to the statics more than 30 percent of Russian teens adore Japanese anime. Hence, films made by people’s compatriots are not able to interest people making similar films.
All in all, it is clear that local industry needs more government’s sponsorship, to attract more persons by the quality and novel plot. Famous directors do not need money help, while young and starting ones are not able to to provide the film shooting themsleves. For example, Hollywood directors like Stiven Spielberg or James Cameron do not need money, while young and talented films makers often leave this area as no one wants to sponsor them. Consequently, as much as possible directors should be funded to shoot qualitative films to make this profession popular and prestigious.
To sum up, nowadays local film industry is in crisis because of the absence of good sponsorship and government’s support. If the authorities understand this problem, film industry will sharply grow up.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Garrett | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | mohammad.iraf | 56 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Dancing plays an important role in a culture 76
- Ecotourism is now defined as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment What are the advantages of ecotourism How can we make ecotourism more popular 74
- Media surrounds us from the shows we watch on television to the music we listen to on the radio How does media affect the society Do you agree that the impact of media has more disadvantages than benefits 84
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- The planet's population is reaching unsustainable levels, and people are facing shortage of resources like water, food and fuel. To what consequences may overpopulation lead? In your opinion, what measures can be taken to fight overpopulation? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e arena of entertainment and education. However loads of people adore films made by ext...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...le young and starting ones are not able to to provide the film shooting themsleves. F...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, another thing, for example, for instance, kind of, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1388101983 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71639926456 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594900849858 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3696918203 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.705882353 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351257045207 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101585027212 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567533929639 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187546880576 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408084556563 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.