Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peopie make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
It is true that new technolog es have had an irfluence on communication between people. Technoloyy hes affected relationships in var ous ways, ard in riy opinion there are buth positive and negative effects Technology has had an impact on relatonships in business, education and social life. Firstlyv, telephones and the Intemet allow tusiness people in different ccuntries to interact without ever meeting each ocher. Secondly, services like Skype create new possblities for relationships between stucents and teachers For example, a student can now take videO lessons with a teecher in a different city or country. Final y, many people use socdial networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their cempu:ers rather than face to face. On the ore hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between peape in different countries was muCh more difficult when commun cation was limited to written letlers or teleyranis- mond many of us henefit from these interactions, either in work or social Nowadays, inter action s ty emeil, phone or videu are elmost faca-to-'ace cor lexts. On tlhie ollier liand, the availalil ty of new commuicalion technologies ca also have the result af isolating penple and discouraging real interact on. Far exanpie, many young people choose to nake friends on ine rather than mixing with thei peers in the real world, and these 'vrtual relationships are a pcor substitute for real friendships. In cenclusion, technology has cerainly revoluticnised commuricatior between people, tut not all of the outcomes ot tris revolut on have been positive
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peopie make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 56
- The chart shows the central heating system at a house works.write a report for a university lecturer making comparisons where relevant and reporting the main features. 61
- People want their country to host an international sporting events. Other believes that international sporting event bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both the points of view and give your opinion. 73
- we cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent da you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that new technolog es have ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...ommunication between people. Technoloyy hes affected relationships in var ous ways,...
^^^
Line 1, column 1609, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d commuricatior between people, tut not all of the outcomes ot tris revolut on have been p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32824427481 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97173131251 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.702290076336 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5984025355 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.6 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180162029976 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635816866241 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317657629569 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180162029976 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.