Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
The legal system has always been a topic of debate among different groups. While some believe that there should be a predefined punishment for every kind of crime, I side with those who think that the reason for a crime must be considered while deciding the destiny of a miscreant.
On the one hand, they argue that a fixed sentence will make the legal system more efficient. The concurrent jurisdiction system of almost every other country has been blamed due to its slow decisions. It can be argued that by setting standardised punishments will help the authorities to make quick decisions. Resultantly, this increased pace will help the Judges to clear all the pending cases at a rapid pace. Pakistan law system, for example, has a ton of pending cases from the last five years due to which injustice in the country is observable.
On the other hand, in my opinion, the situation in which the crime commits must be account-for while making a final judgement. Firstly, not every offence is intentional. The criminal history is full of examples in which an unlawful act merely happened due to negligence by a person. Similarly, in my view, most of the juvenile delinquencies often occur when criminals use children for their purposes. Hence, in these situations, punishing juveniles with other habitual criminals would be unjustice with them. Resultantly, in future, the probability of making them a civilised member of a society will be reduced significantly.
To conclude, although predetermined punishments can help to reduce the backlog of the pending cases, punishing unintentional crimes with deliberate crimes would prevail injustice in the society. Therefore, on balance, I think while deciding sentences, the motives behind committing crimes must be taken under consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-05 | bebe | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | abhishek1408 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-19 | Anupama Barooah | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | khushi1407 | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | khushi1407 | 61 | view |
- You would like to attend a training course. Write a letter to your company manager. In your letter, you should say:why you would like to attend this course?why it would be beneficial for you and the company?suggest how to arrange time for it. 78
- Some people say the main way to be happy in life is to have a lot of money. How might having a lot of money make people happy?What other things in life can make people happy? 84
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 78
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? 84
- Some people feel that global warming should be dealt with by governments Others feel that it is the responsibility of individuals in society to solve the problem Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ld be unjustice with them. Resultantly, in future, the probability of making them a civil...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, kind of, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95399394835 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590277777778 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2775876154 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.266666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348367717262 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964097781721 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096726589864 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21463855982 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850957836756 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.