It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement contends that it is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. thinking about the introduction that people usually give to others, the statement is generally true, as human is cited as social animal and the filtering activates before introducing oneself.
Human is cited as social animal and it is easily recognized that humans think oneself as the part of the society, not the opposite way. The best way to examine the identification would be remembering how people introduce oneself to newly met people. According to the New York Times, the first sentence of the introduction includes one’ name and where the person is working. Also, people usually ask about what kind of university that student is attending, or what kind of company the business person is working as a chief manager.
While conceding the statement above, the opponents of the statement contend that as the person gets longer time for introduce oneself, the one explains about what oneself is truly are such as explaining personal proclivity of colors and dishes. Rather than listing the names and titles of the societies that the one was once or is included, the person shows one’s personal identity, exposing the unique character to others. Therefore, the identification is more focused on the personality, not the social group.
It is true that people gives more information about heterogeneous aspects when introducing to others, such contention could be stated because it is not profoundly examined about what different perspective that people are willing to expose. Even when introducing oneself, no one arbitrarily throws the information about what the other might think dirty and ominous. They usually think about something amicable and sanguine considering the relation among them.
In conclusion, when the people define themselves, they primarily set as the participant of the social groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-27 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | tomlee0205 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-09 | 宋致遠 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-07 | pavithra ramesh | 62 | view |
- a nation should require all of its students to study the same national cirriculum until they enter college write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base bec 59
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 50
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton 50 miles away Moreover relative to population size the diagnosis of stress related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton Acco 58
- Several factors indicate that KNOW radio can no longer succeed as a rock and roll music station Consider for example that the number of people in our listening area over fifty years of age has increased dramatically while our total number of listeners has 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thinking
...social groups that we define ourselves. thinking about the introduction that people usua...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...way to examine the identification would be remembering how people introduce oneself to newly m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ne explains about what oneself is truly are such as explaining personal proclivity ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38157894737 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83023226634 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8273943807 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.846153846 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104313699714 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532140610448 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939231409135 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781449440063 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752722601036 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.