A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal receive little to no professional dental care, while people in suburban areas in the United States see a dentist an average of 1.25 times per year. Thus, regular dental care is not helpful in preventing tooth decay.
The argument concludes that the regular dental care is not helping in preventing tooth decay based on only factor that the people in Himalayan region in Nepal have better dental health despite of less privilege to regular dental checkup. However, it is lacking the extent of other factors that is promoting the dental health in Himalayan people and those deteriorating health in people in suburban United States.
Food habits plays a major role in people dental health. People who eat healthy and consume few sugars in their food tends to have low levels of tooth decay. Organic foods promotes health and makes body immune to various germs and helps in making human body stronger. Consumption of meat in excess amounts deteriorate tooth. It does not state any information about the food habits of the people. Moreover, eating habits plays a significant role in dental health. Eating at the particular intervals of time and not consuming food before two hours of sleeping time and also good habits like brushing teeth twice in a day-mornings and evenings helps a lot in promoting dental health. The argument does not state any relation between the food habits, eating habits and brushing habits of people from both the places.
Argument does not state any relationship between the climatic conditions and immunity towards particular germs in the region. For instance, people living in tropical regions are immune to malaria whereas people living near arctic poles not. The people living in Himalayan regions might be immune to the germs that help in decaying tooth whereas people in United nations not. Depending on the minerals and nutrients they consume from air, water and other natural resources and also depending on the genetics the people get immune to many germs, viruses.
Hence, the argument lacks in justifying the conclusion that regular dental care is not helpful in preventing tooth decay as it fails to provide evidence to support and lacks relations in many aspects when comparing people from two different places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | AaronFernandes | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | writingishard | 59 | view |
| 2022-06-24 | Nalu00 | 53 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Adz12345 | 53 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 60
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal rec 50
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.6327345309 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.9520958084 8% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 332.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14156626506 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41438350594 2.78398813304 87% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493975903614 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7844280993 57.8364921388 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 5.70786347227 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200087902827 0.218282227539 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746263620166 0.0743258471296 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773198838346 0.0701772020484 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126946772642 0.128457276422 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762474763335 0.0628817314937 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.3799401198 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.