The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables compare the sales of coffee and bananas that are labeled Fairtrade in 5 different countries in Europe in 1999 and 2004.
It is noticeable that the overall amounts of money spent on coffee and bananas in 5 surveyed countries rose despite downward trends in the figures for bananas in Belgium and Sweden.
In the year 1999, a mere 1.5 million euros Fairtrade earned from selling coffee in the UK, while the sales figures for bananas in this country were significantly higher, at 15 million euros. By contrast, Switzerland spent 3 million euros on coffee in 1999, but only 1 million euros on bananas. The sales of the two products were similar, between 0.6 and 2 million euros in other countries.
In 2004, coffee sales in the UK and Switzerland experienced just over tenfold and doubled growths to 20 and 6 million euros, respectively. There were no significant changes in the figures for the three remaining countries in terms of coffee sales. Thí year, although Belgium and Sweden saw a marginal drop of 0.8 and 1.1 million euros in their sales of bananas, opposite trends were seen in the UK, Switzerland, and Denmark with the respective figures reaching 47, 5.5, and 4 million euros.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them Education and job training are better ways to help them Do you agree or disagree 84
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85853658537 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60863892204 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5101471344 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253282916683 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144531732864 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145683336281 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223245496325 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166508220017 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.