Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion
The development of technology play an important role in this era. One of that is community technology which help people to interact with others through electronic devices. Some people think that modern technology making people friendlier. However, other people think that high-tech productions will make people less affable. From my point of view, with the wise using, I strongly agree with the statement that technology will help people more sociable.
Firstly, technological innovations erase the vast distance between people all around the world. People now easily contact with the one that live at another side of the planet through their little smartphone and wireless connection. Without physical meeting, people still can see others appearance and hear their voices. It will help people, especially who are studying or working abroad, connect with their families and friends more frequently due to the convenience that machinery bring us and strengthen the relationship. Secondly, the common use of the Internet help people making new friends without any difficulties. People who have the same character and hobby can match on the social network in order to get in touch by chatting, posting images and calling phone.
On the other hand, technology can affect our life negatively. We see say that people are sticking to the virtual world and they avoid to communicate with each other. For example, children are the target of games and videos. Their lack of awareness are the weak point that evil people can abuse and make the children in bad trouble. Moreover, Internet shopping can drain our money quickly and bring people in debt status which no one want this. The information security is also the matter that people give their eyes in.
In conclusion, although technological evolution brings some harmful effect to our life the advantages it bring us is outweighed the disadvantages by their great convenience and the marvelous invention in communicating that bring people closer together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-07 | ieltsstudent | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | ieltsstudent | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | Hoang Minh | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-02 | pris | 95 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | sanimergill | 67 | view |
- Governments spend a lot of money on public celebrations such as national holidays and public festivals. Some people say that the government spends too much on this and that they should use this money on other useful things.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- In the future people may have to live on other planets Some think that is therefore important to spend money researching other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
- This bar graph shows the number of days lost due to injury per worker for five countries There are three time periods shown beginning with the year 1991 and ending in 2005 79
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 80
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid communicating'.
Suggestion: avoid communicating
... sticking to the virtual world and they avoid to communicate with each other. For example, children ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...ul effect to our life the advantages it bring us is outweighed the disadvantages by t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30503144654 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68942209018 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588050314465 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9891963399 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310434585635 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111313230984 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115975540699 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189380626699 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11716806698 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid communicating'.
Suggestion: avoid communicating
... sticking to the virtual world and they avoid to communicate with each other. For example, children ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...ul effect to our life the advantages it bring us is outweighed the disadvantages by t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30503144654 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68942209018 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588050314465 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9891963399 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310434585635 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111313230984 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115975540699 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189380626699 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11716806698 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.