A nation should require all if its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Using a national curriculum has been an idea the education system has contemplated with for several years. As some states choose to adopt the common core standards and others do not, this leads to a controversial ideal that as a nation we should require a national curriculum. In my opinion, I mostly agree with this suggestion that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. Looking towards two ideals would give us a position on whether or not it would be advantageous to adopt the recommendation.
To begin, requiring students to all study the same national curriculum until they enter college, would academically “even the playing field” for students. If we are all learning the same curriculum, we are all at the same baseline with our knowledge prior to college. An example of this could be shown in states that choose to adopt the common core standards and states that do not. States that have adopted the common core are all working towards the same standards in different curriculum areas, thus are all on the same “playing field.” States that do not adopt the common core, can have standards they will are fit for them. What if a state chose not to teach algebra? As algebra is a common subject on the SAT, those students will not be on the same page as the students who had algebra with the common core. This ideal would lead to the agreement of the suggestion that as a nation we should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum.
Secondly, all factors need to be taken into consideration if we are asking the nation to all study the same curriculum. One of these factors is considering if there is equal access for everyone. As a nation we have areas that are in more of an economic disadvantage than others. This could lead to hiring teachers that aren’t credentialed, even with the same curriculum, would it be taught in the same way? Are there parts of the curriculum that are online? If so, in an economically disadvantaged area may not have access. When considering if using the same national curriculum would truly be the same, is one of the many questions that arises with this recommendation.
This issue proves to many factors that need to be considered as this is a complex idea. There is not a black and white answer or a clear cut yes or no when deliberating if a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year out late night new program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaint 68
- A nation should require all if its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... two ideals would give us a position on whether or not it would be advantageous to adopt the r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... if there is equal access for everyone. As a nation we have areas that are in more...
^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... and white answer or a clear cut yes or no when deliberating if a nation should re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, in my opinion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71232876712 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71060339785 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401826484018 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9463737165 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513252424146 0.243740707755 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186744486744 0.0831039109588 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209424304907 0.0758088955206 276% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.394838431401 0.150359130593 263% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951235722893 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.